Saturday, June 27, 2009

Another Injured worker speaks....

Wretched Slaves & Illiteracy Brokers
NOVEMBER 23rd 2007

Labour market re-entry (LMR), suitable employment or business (SEB), and non- economic loss (NEL) policies define the profit margins for the WSIB. Wording in the policies, such as "suitable for the worker," "and is available," and "calculate the percentage of permanent impairment," can be read in many different ways. Intentional vagueness leads to bad interpretations by the WSIB that negatively affect injured workers. It is my belief that, in order to extort extra profit, the WSIB have been misinterpreting the meanings of their LMR, SEB, and NEL programs.

Unfortunately, injured workers do not have the right to choose a new job or career. The WSIB has the final say in all LMR plans. Sad, but true, the WSIB have total control because it is written in the act. When an LMR program is improper or it is contrary to injured workers restrictions, they must comply or appeal the LMR. Even though some LMR plans are illegal, injured workers must comply during the appeal processes. Most injured workers do not appeal their LMR out of fear of reprisal. LOE benefits are subject to suspension if the WSIB feels the case warrants it, and this tactic keeps injured workers in line and silent. Regrettably, in the act, the WSIB has the final say, thus leaving injured workers only two choices: suck it up, or appeal and face the executioner who has the right to cut off all benefits.

Suitable employment or business only means suitable if the WSIB says it is suitable, so they can hurry up and get those injured workers back to work. Nowhere in the act does it explain the, (suitable business), and the WSIB does not support self-employment. Even if injured workers were self- employed their entire lives, the WSIB forces them to become employees. Although the act clearly states that the work must be “suitable to the worker,” and the plans be mutually agreed upon, it also states that the WSIB has exclusive jurisdiction to examine, hear and decide all matters and questions arising under the act, except where the act provides otherwise. Lawfully, the WSIB holds the exclusive rights to the meaning of suitable. The SEB wage determined solely by the WSIB forces injured workers into acceptance. If injured workers disagree with their SEB, they can appeal. The same rules apply to both the SEB and LMR appeals: that injured workers must comply until the appeal is final and hope their benefits remain active. There is nothing suitable about a life changing decision that forces injured workers to suck it up because of a WSIB exclusive decision.

Injured workers who have a permanent injury are entitled to a non- economic loss award, and the WSIB have sole-ownership of that decision. Charts, graphs, pre-determined calculations, assessments, and medical reports are the sources that the WSIB use to determine the dollar value of the NEL. However, if proper assessments are not done, the calculation of the whole person’s being will be grossly inaccurate, rendering the percentage of loss as a bad guess. NEL processes that are missing pertinent information such as a psychological assessment are biased and un-fair.

Pg2 Wretched Slaves and Illiteracy Brokers
Injured workers must choose a doctor from a roster list supplied by the WSIB that could lead to a biased assessment. Injured workers may appeal the NEL award amount within thirty days. Unlike the LMR and the SEB appeals, the WSIB have no “fail to comply rules” that affect LOE benefits. Sole-ownership of decisions that the WSIB have regarding injured workers sends them the clear message of dictatorship.

It is my belief that there are no logical or ethical reasons behind the use of inadequate WSIB assessments, and I believe, that money is the motive behind the inadequate assessments and all missing assessments that the WSIB refuse to do! Money is the WSIB's, number one choice of weapon, because they use it to make and coerce injured workers to comply. Furthermore, it is like bait during the LMR and SEB appeal processes. While the WSIB dangles money at the end of the appellant's rainbow, they are lead to believe that they can reach it if they comply. Because of the fear of loosing their benefits, they know they must comply during the appeal processes. I believe the wording for these short forms should read as follows:
• LMR (lamed minimum-wagers refurbished,)
• SEB (second-rate employment or bamboozlement,)
• NEL (notional embellished looters.)
These interpretations make sense, because the WSIB treat injured workers like this, and in all matters of this writing. I know this, because this is the treatment I have received, and I bare witness to it all. Furthermore, I believe that the act does not protect injured workers from mal-treatment. In certainty, I truly believe that the act was written by the friends of the WSIB, because it is fundamentally against injured workers rights. Any law written that gives sole ownership of decisions like the WSIB have is bias, unethical, unconscionable and criminal. This too shall pass!



Truth’s Judgment
November 30, 2007
Thank you for causing me pain. It is your lying words that drive me; me who loves to reveal all lies and secrets. Your ramblings old man have caused me to seek you; because you have fallen
The man: the WSIB chair, permanently attach him to a chair. Medicine is what he needs, not being an addict, they will not affect him. Oh no, he will rise above any addiction that he causes, but it will not be him causing them.
Rain on him and those who help him; and stop raining on the ones that refuse to. Then it can become a violent rain, like they have never known. The unknown will bind them, so then the others will no longer be afraid, then they can speak the truth.
Once again, Truth will come forth and lay them to rest.
Unacceptable, they are!
Truth has condemned them, for their choices are evil.
They will look up to the sky, but they are not part of it.
They will cling to their lies, because lies are their nature.
They have failed to be redeemed to forgiveness, as they have so declined.
They will fight for their lives as in days of old; they believe in their lies, but their judgments have long ago been foretold.
They will pray for their lies to save them; but they will parish in defeat.
Truly I tell you; they are not who they seem to be, not even the least of them.
But soon they will be seen for what they truly are.

If two of you agree on earth about anything you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in Heaven.

Comment sent by Al King thank u Al.


(PDM)

Thank you Al for taking the time to send us your poetic words and insights.
Good luck in your quest for truth and injured workers rights!
We need more people to stand up and spread the truth out there than we are getting.

Warm regards,
PDM

No comments: